Use of the flat panel detector fluoroscope reduces radiation exposure during periacetabular osteotomy.

The Periacetabular Osteotomy is a technically demanding procedure that requires precise intraoperative evaluation of pelvic anatomy. Fluoroscopic images pose a radiation risk to operating room staff, scrubbed personnel, and the patient. Most commonly, a Standard Fluoroscope with an Image Intensifier is used. Our institution recently implemented the novel Fluoroscope with a Flat Panel Detector. The purpose of this study was to compare radiation dosage and accuracy between the two fluoroscopes. A retrospective review of a consecutive series of patients who underwent Periacetabular Osteotomy for symptomatic hip dysplasia was completed. The total radiation exposure dose (mGy) was recorded and compared for each case from the standard fluoroscope (n = 27) and the flat panel detector (n = 26) cohorts. Lateral center edge angle was measured and compared intraoperatively and at the six-week postoperative visit. A total of 53 patients (96% female) with a mean age and BMI of 17.84 (± 6.84) years and 22.66 (± 4.49) kg/m2 (standard fluoroscope) and 18.23 (± 4.21) years and 21.99 (± 4.00) kg/m2 (flat panel detector) were included. The standard fluoroscope averaged total radiation exposure to be 410.61(± 193.02) mGy, while the flat panel detector averaged 91.12 (± 49.64) mGy (p < 0.0001). The average difference (bias) between intraoperative and 6-week postoperative lateral center edge angle measurement was 0.36° (limits of agreement: - 3.19 to 2.47°) for the standard fluoroscope and 0.27° (limits of agreement: - 2.05 to 2.59°) for the flat panel detector cohort. Use of fluoroscopy with flat panel detector technology decreased the total radiation dose exposure intraoperatively and produced an equivalent assessment of intraoperative lateral center edge angle. Decreasing radiation exposure to young patients is imperative to reduce the risk of future comorbidities.

[Evaluation of spino-pelvic mobility; its importance in preventing total hip replacement dislocation]. / Evaluación de la movilidad espino-pélvica; su importancia para prevenir la luxación de prótesis total de cadera.

Recently, it has been recognized that changes in sagittal alignment and spinopelvic mobility due to alterations of the lumbosacral spine can influence the dislocation of a hip replacement. The biggest difficulties for this problem are: a) the bibliography related to this topic has been written in English and there is confusion in its terminology; b) there is no consensus on what parameters should be used to identify, measure, and estimate the risks of dislocation occurring; c) the basic concepts that interrelate spinal disorders and prosthetic dislocation are not clearly understood; and d) spine and hip surgeons pursue different goals. The objective of this narrative review is to overcome the aforementioned difficulties by using a strategy to answer some questions: Is hip dislocation really a problem? What is the interrelationship between alterations in the pelvic spinal balance and the dislocation of a prosthesis? How is sagittal balance and lumbosacral mobility defined and how can their alterations be measured? What are their compensatory mechanisms to achieve a good functioning and how these mechanisms can be used to correctly orient the acetabulum? To document this review, we consulted the databases of PubMed, Scopus, SciELO and Google Scholar with the keywords: Spinopelvic, Total Hip Arthroplasty, Hip Dislocation, Spine-Pelvis-hip Arthroplasty. The articles that, in the author's opinion, were the most objective and/or relevant for the study of this topic were selected.

Recientemente se ha reconocido que los cambios en alineación sagital y la movilidad espino-pélvica por alteraciones de la columna lumbosacra pueden ejercer influencia en la luxación de una prótesis de cadera. Las mayores dificultades para este problema son: a) que la bibliografía relacionada con este tema se ha escrito en idioma inglés y hay confusiones en su terminología; b) no hay consenso de cuáles son los parámetros que deben utilizarse para identificarla, medirla y para estimar los riesgos de que ocurra una luxación; c) no se conocen con claridad los conceptos básicos que interrelacionen los trastornos de la columna y la luxación protésica; y d) que los cirujanos de columna y artroplásticos de cadera persiguen diferentes objetivos. Esta revisión narrativa persigue como objetivo allanar las dificultades antes mencionadas, utilizando como estrategia contestar algunas preguntas: ¿la luxación de cadera es realmente un problema?; ¿cuál es la interrelación entre las alteraciones en el balance espino-pélvico y la luxación de una prótesis?; ¿cómo se define el balance sagital y la movilidad lumbosacra y cómo se pueden medir sus alteraciones?; ¿cuáles son sus mecanismos compensatorios para lograr un buen funcionamiento, y cómo se pueden aprovechar estos mecanismos para orientar correctamente el acetábulo? Para documentar esta revisión se consultaron las bases de datos de PubMed, Scopus, SciELO y Google Académico con las palabras clave: Spinopelvic, Total Hip Arthroplasty, Hip Dislocation, Spine-Pelvis-hip Arthroplasty. Se seleccionaron los artículos que a juicio del autor fueron los más objetivos y/o relevantes para el estudio de este tema.

Clinical reasoning for the continuation or discontinuation of hip precautions after total hip arthroplasty in Switzerland: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Growing evidence raises doubts about the need for routine hip precautions after primary total hip replacements to reduce the risk of postoperative dislocation. However, hip precautions are still routinely and widely prescribed in postoperative care in Switzerland. We aimed to investigate experts' clinical reasoning for hip precaution recommendations after total hip arthroplasty. METHODS: Using a convenience sampling strategy, 14 semi-structured expert interviews were conducted with surgeons, physiotherapists, and occupational therapists in the vicinity of an inpatient rehabilitation clinic in Switzerland. Data analysis followed Mayring's principle of inductive and deductive structuring content analysis. RESULTS: Expert statements from the interviews were summarised into four main categories and 10 subcategories. Categories included statements on the incidences of dislocation and underlying risk factors; current preferences and use of hip precautions; their effect on physical function, anxiety, or costs; and patient's adherence to the movement restrictions. Hip surgeons routinely prescribed hip precautions, although in different variations. Fear of dislocation and caution are barriers to changing current practice. Some surgeons are considering individualised prescribing based on patients' risk of dislocation, which therapists would welcome. CONCLUSION: A lack of clear instructions from the surgeon leads to ambiguity among therapists outside the acute hospital. A shared understanding of the need for and nature of hip precautions, guidelines from societies, or at least specific instructions from surgeons to therapists are warranted.

Closed reduction of dislocated hip prosthesis using a traction table.

This article describes three cases in which a dislocated hip prosthesis was reduced by a new reduction technique - that we previously described - using traction table. The dissociation of a prosthesis is a rare but serious complication of closed reduction manoeuvre. The new reduction manoeuvre using a traction table may be a good option to avoid dissociation of the prosthesis during closed reduction for treatment of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty.

Does Size Really Matter? Incidence of Periprosthetic Fractures After Femoral Osteotomy in Patients With Cerebral Palsy.

OBJECTIVE: Of children, 30% to 35% with cerebral palsy (CP) develop hip subluxation or dislocation and often require reconstructive hip surgery, including varus derotation osteotomy (VDRO). A recent literature review identified postoperative fractures as the most common complication (9.4%) of VDROs. This study aimed to assess risk factors for periprosthetic fracture after VDRO in children with CP. METHODS: A total of 347 patients (644 hips, 526 bilateral hips) with CP and hip subluxation or dislocation (129 females; mean age at index VDRO: 8.6 y, SD 3.4, range: 1.5 to 17.7; 2 Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) I, 35 GMFCS II, 39 GMFCS III, 119 GMFCS IV, 133 GMFCS V, 21 unavailable) were included in this retrospective, single-group intervention (VDRO) study at a tertiary referral center. Imaging and clinical documentation for patients age 18 years or younger at index surgery, treated with VDRO were reviewed to determine demographic data, GMFCS level, surgeon, type of hardware implanted, use of anticonvulsants and steroids, type of postoperative immobilization, presence of periprosthetic fractures, fracture location and mechanism, and time from surgery to fracture. Potential determinants of periprosthetic fractures were assessed using mixed effects logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 644 hips, 14 (2.2%, 95% CI: 1.3%, 3.6%) sustained a periprosthetic fracture, at a median of 2.1 years postoperatively (interquartile range: 4.6 y, range: 1.2 mo to 7.8 y). Patients with a fracture had a median age at index surgery of 7.3 years (interquartile range: 4.3, range: 2.8 to 17.8; 1 GMFCS II, 6 GMFCS IV, 7 GMFCS V). Periprosthetic fractures were not significantly related to age at index surgery ( P = 0.18), sex ( P = 0.30), body mass index percentile ( P = 0.87), surgery side ( P = 0.16), anticonvulsant use ( P = 0.35), type of postoperative immobilization ( P = 0.40), GMFCS level ( P = 0.31), or blade plate size ( P = 0.17). Only surgeon volume significantly related to periprosthetic fracture (odds ratio = 5.03, 95% CI: 1.53, 16.56, P = 0.008), with the highest-volume surgeon also using smaller blade plates ( P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Periprosthetic fractures after VDRO surgery in children with CP are uncommon, and routine hardware removal appears unnecessary. The data suggest that the common dogma of putting in the largest blade plate possible to maximize fixation may increase the risk of periprosthetic fracture. Due to the overall low fracture rate, especially when contextualized relative to the risk of hardware removal, a reactive approach to hardware removal appears warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-retrospective study (targeting varus derotational osteotomies in children with cerebral palsy).

A rare soccer-related injury: Traumatic posterior hip fracture-dislocation - Case series and overview of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Soccer is one of the most popular sports with millions of active professional and non-professional players worldwide. Traumatic hip dislocations are rare in soccer but can lead to major sequelae both physically and psychologically. The aim of this review was to obtain insight into the outcomes after surgerically repaired hip fracture-dislocation in soccer players as well as rehabilitation and prevention. METHODS: Two cases of a posterior hip fracture-dislocation that occurred during an amateur soccer match are presented and mechanism of injury, complications and rehabilitation were analysed. Follow-up of both patients was at least one year after surgery. Questionnaires and physical examinations were obtained to quantify and qualify outcome. RESULTS: In both cases the hip-dislocations were reduced within 3 h after injury. Semi-elective open reduction and internal fixation was performed within seven days. In one case, there was a concomitant Pipkin fracture and sciatic nerve neuropathy. There were no postoperative complications. Follow-up showed full of range of motion and normal hip functionality in both cases. However, both patients indicated a reduced quality of life and anxiety related to the accident. CONCLUSION: Traumatic hip fracture-dislocations during soccer practice are extremely rare. Despite uncomplicated fracture healing after surgery and return of hip function, both patients still suffer from psychological problems resulting in a decreased quality of life. Further research is required to enhance psychological outcomes, as well as to facilitate return to pre-injury levels of participation and engagement in sports following traumatic hip fracture-dislocations related to soccer.

Impact of combined lumbar spine fusion and total hip arthroplasty on spine, pelvis, and hip kinematics during a sit to stand task.

Lumbar fusion is a risk factor for hip dislocation following total hip arthroplasty (THA). The objective was to compare joint/segment angles during sit-stand-sit in participants that had a THA with and without a lumbar fusion. The secondary objective was to compare pain, physical function, disability, and quality of life. This cross-sectional study includes participants that had THA and lumbar fusion (THA-fusion; n = 12) or THA only (THA-only; n = 12). Participants completed sit-stand-sit trials. Joint/segment angles were measured using electromagnetic motion capture. Angle characteristics were determined using principal component analysis. Hierarchical linear models examined relationships between angle characteristics and groups. Pain, physical function, and disability were compared using Mann-Whitney U tests. Upper lumbar spine was more extended during sit-stand-sit in the THA-fusion group (b = 42.41, P = 0.04). The pelvis was more posteriorly and anteriorly tilted during down and end sit-stand-sit phases, respectively, in the THA-fusion group (b = 12.21, P = 0.03). There were no significant associations between group and other angles. THA-fusion group had worse pain, physical function, disability, and quality of life. Although differences in spine joint, pelvis segment, and hip joint angles existed, these findings are unlikely to account for the increased incidence of hip dislocation after total hip arthroplasty in patients that had spine fusion.

Management of long bone fractures and traumatic hip dislocations in paediatric patients: study protocol for a prospective global multicentre observational cohort registry.

INTRODUCTION: Management controversy and clinical equipoise exist in treatments of long bone fractures and traumatic hip dislocation in paediatric patients due to the lack of high-quality clinical evidence. This protocol describes the effort of a large prospective global multicentre cohort study (registry) aiming at providing quality data to assist evidence-based treatment decision-making. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Eligible paediatric patients (N=750-1000) with open physes suffering from proximal humerus fractures, distal humerus fractures, proximal radius fractures, forearm shaft fractures, traumatic hip dislocations, femoral neck fractures or tibial shaft fractures will be recruited over a period of 24-36 months. Hospitalisation and treatment details (including materials and implants) will be captured in a cloud-based, searchable database. Outcome measures include radiographic assessments, clinical outcomes (such as range of motion, limb length discrepancies and implant removal), patient-reported outcomes (Patient Reported Outcomes Of Fracture, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D-Y)) and adverse events.Aside from descriptive statistics on patient demographics, baseline characteristics, types of fractures and adverse event rates, research questions will be formulated based on data availability and quality. A statistical analysis plan will be prepared before the statistical analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval will be obtained before patients are enrolled at each participating site. Patient enrolment will follow an informed consent process approved by the responsible ethics committee. Peer-reviewed publication is planned to disseminate the study results. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04207892.

The relationship between hip displacement, scoliosis, and pelvic obliquity in 106 nonambulatory children with cerebral palsy: a longitudinal retrospective population-based study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The relationship between hip displacement (HD), pelvic obliquity (PO), and scoliosis in nonambulatory children with cerebral palsy (CP) has not been clearly elucidated. The aims of this population-based study were to examine the prevalence and temporal sequence of these deformities in nonambulatory children with CP and to evaluate how probable it is that severe unilateral HD contributes to development of scoliosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This longitudinal study comprised 106 nonambulatory children, enrolled in a surveillance program. Pelvic radiographs for measurements of migration percentage (MP) and PO were taken once a year from the diagnosis of HD. Spine radiographs were taken in patients with clinically detected scoliosis. Radiographic follow-up continued until skeletal maturity. RESULTS: Clinically significant scoliosis (Cobb angle ≥ 40°) occurred in 60 patients at a mean age of 11.8 years. 65 patients developed clinically significant HD (MP ≥ 40%) at a mean age of 4.8 years. 24 patients had no significant hip or spine deformities, 22 had HD only, 17 had scoliosis only, and 43 had both deformities. HD was diagnosed before scoliosis in all except 1 of the patients with both deformities. 14 of 19 patients with severe unilateral HD (MP ≥ 60%) had scoliosis convexity to the opposite side of the displaced hip. CONCLUSION: The combination of scoliosis and HD was frequent, and HD was diagnosed first in almost all the patients. HD might be a contributory cause of scoliosis in patients with severe, unilateral HD, PO, and later scoliosis with convexity to the opposite side.

Insufficient stem antetorsion and lower cup abduction is a combined risk factor for posterior hip dislocation in patients undergoing THA for femoral neck fractures: a retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: The role of acetabular and femoral component positions with respect to the risk of post-operative instability and dislocation remains debated. In this study, we aimed to identify potential risk factors for early dislocation following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) for displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures (FNF) using radiological measurements. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data for patients who underwent cementless primary THA for FNF using a posterolateral approach between January 2018 and December 2021. Follow-up duration, age, sex, affected side, and mean time from THA to dislocation were recorded. Leg-length inequality, abductor lever arm, vertical and horizontal femoral offsets, vertical and horizontal hip centers of rotation, abduction, anteversion of the acetabulum and femoral prosthesis, and combined anteversion were measured. RESULTS: The study sample included 17 men and 34 women, with 21 and 30 patients undergoing left- and right-hip operations, respectively. The mean patient age was 70.18 ± 7.64 years, and the mean follow-up duration was 27.73 ± 13.52 months. The mean time between THA and dislocation was 1.58 ± 0.79 months. Seven patients (13.73%) sustained posterior dislocation of the hip. The abduction angle (36.05 ± 6.82° vs. 45.68 ± 8.78°) (p = 0.008) and anteversion of the femoral prosthesis (8.26 ± 4.47° vs. 19.47 ± 9.01°) (p = 0.002) were significantly lower in the dislocation group than in the control group. There were no significant differences in other parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Insufficient stem antetorsion combined with lower abduction angle of the acetabular component were associated with a high risk of dislocation, especially in patients with deep flexion or internal rotation of the flexed hip joint and knees, or in patients with a stiff spine or anterior pelvic tilt, impingement may then occur in the neck of the prosthesis and cup component, ultimately resulting in posterior dislocation. These findings could remind surgeons to avoid simultaneous occurrence of both in THA surgery. These results provide new insight into risk factors for hip dislocation in patients undergoing primary THA for FNF and may aid in reducing the risk of instability and dislocation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective comparative study Level II.

Instability in Patients With Lumbar Spine Disease Undergoing Posterior Approach and Lateral Approach Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Dislocation rates in patients who have fixed spinopelvic motion have been reported up to 20%. Few studies have directly compared dislocation rates in patients who have spine pathology undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) through different surgical approaches. This study compared postoperative dislocation rates in patients who had lumbar spine disease and underwent primary THA using a posterior or direct lateral approach. METHODS: Between 2011 and 2017, consecutive cohorts of primary THAs were retrospectively reviewed. One surgeon routinely used a posterior approach, while the other used a direct lateral approach. Chart and radiographic review were conducted to identify patients who had lumbar spine disease. Dislocations among cohorts with and without lumbar spine disease were compared by posterior and direct lateral approaches. RESULTS: The overall dislocation rate was 1.3% (15/1,198). The top four predictors of dislocation were presence of lumbar spine disease (odds ratio [OR] 5.0; P = 0.014), posterior surgical approach (OR, 6.5; P = 0.074), cases performed for fracture (OR, 4.4; P = 0.035), and women (OR, 4.6; P = 0.050). Dislocation rates among direct lateral approach patients who had lumbar spine pathology were significantly lower than posterior approach patients who had lumbar spine pathology (0.0% versus 3.6%; P = 0.011). DISCUSSION: Although dislocation rates were low in both groups, study results suggest that a direct lateral approach for primary THA may reduce postoperative dislocations for patients who have limited spinopelvic motion due to lumbar spine pathology. Furthermore, surgeons using the posterior approach might consider optimizing the femoral head to acetabular cup ratio in patients who have lumbar spine disease.

The Relationship Between Postoperative Patient-Reported Psychological Outcomes and Preoperative Pain Characteristics in Patients Who Underwent Periacetabular Osteotomy.

This study sought to investigate the relationship between multiple preoperative characteristics of pain (maximum pain severity location, the presence of pain in certain locations, the highest level of pain, and the number of pain locations) and psychological outcome measures as reported by patients. Fifty-four hips (50 patients) that underwent periacetabular osteotomy to treat acetabular dysplasia between February 2017 and July 2020 were reviewed using the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-21 (DASS21), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), radiographic analysis, and questionnaires concerning pain severity/location. Twenty-six hips had their worst pain in the groin, whereas 28 hips had greater or equal levels of pain at another location. There was no significant difference between these two locations on any of the postoperative psychological outcomes (HADS, P=.53; DASS21, P=.85; PCS, P=.97). Additionally, there was not a significant relationship between pain in any location other than the groin and any postoperative psychological outcomes (P≥.08). Finally, the highest level of preoperative pain and the number of locations of pain demonstrated no significant relationship with postoperative psychological outcomes (maximum severity: HADS, P=.28; DASS21, P=.49; PCS, P=.57; number of pain locations: HADS, P=.47; DASS21, P=.60; PCS, P=.35). Variance in preoperative pain location, severity, and number of pain locations seemingly does not result in any significant effect on postoperative psychological outcomes. Thus, a large range of patients with acetabular dysplasia may experience similar, favorable psychological outcomes from treatment with periacetabular osteotomy notwithstanding the characteristics of preoperative pain. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(1):28-33.].

Hip displacements and correctable scoliosis were prevalent in children with cerebral palsy registered in a Danish follow-up programme from 2010 to 2020.

AIM: We need a better understanding of non-surgical interventions for hip dislocations and scoliosis. This study estimated the cumulative incidence of problems among children with cerebral palsy and described the type and frequency of therapist-led interventions. METHODS: The study comprised 1482 children (58% male) aged 0-15 years, with a mean age of 3.6 years, who were registered in the Danish Cerebral Palsy Follow-up Programme from 2010 to 2020. We used the Kaplan-Meier estimator to examine the cumulative incidence of hip displacement, hip dislocation, correctable scoliosis and non-correctable scoliosis. The type and frequency of therapist-led interventions are reported descriptively. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of hip displacement and hip dislocation were 15.8% and 3.5%, respectively, and 39.0% and 13.9% for correctable and non-correctable scoliosis. The most frequently reported type of therapist-led intervention was a joint range of motion exercise. We found that 60.5% with hip displacements and 43.8% with correctable scoliosis used a standing aid. A further 5.4% used a spinal orthosis to prevent deformity and 8.1% for stabilisation. CONCLUSION: Hip displacement and correctable scoliosis were prevalent in children with cerebral palsy, whereas the occurrence of hip dislocations and non-correctable scoliosis was low. The use of assistive aids was low.

Dual Mobility for Oncological Hip Reconstruction: Significantly Reduced Dislocation Rates at 5 years.

BACKGROUND: Although dual mobility total hip arthroplasty has become increasingly common in recent years, limited remains known on dual mobility in surgical oncology. This university-based investigation compared dislocation and revision rates of DMs, conventional total hip arthroplasty (THA), and hemiarthroplasties (HAs) for oncological hip reconstruction. METHODS: An institutional tumor registry was used to identify 221 patients undergoing 45 DMs, 67 conventional THAs, and 109 HAs, performed for 17 primary hip tumors and 204 hip metastases between 2010 and 2020. The median age at surgery was 65 years, and 52% were female. The mean follow-up was 2.5 years. Kaplan-Meier survivorship curves and log-rank tests were done to compare dislocation and revision rates among all 221 patients, after a one-to-one propensity match, based on age, sex, tumor type (metastasis, primary tumor), and tumor localization (femur, acetabulum). RESULTS: The 5-year survivorship free of dislocation was 98% in DMs, 66% in conventional THAs ( P = 0.03; all P values compared with DMs), and 97% among HAs ( P = 0.48). The 5-year survivorship free of revision was 69% in DMs, 62% in conventional THAs ( P = 0.68), and 92% in HAs ( P = 0.06). After propensity matching, the 5-year survivorship free of dislocation was 42% in 45 conventional THAs ( P = 0.027; compared with all 45 DMs) and 89% in 16 matched HAs ( P = 0.19; compared with 16 DMs with femoral involvement only). The 5-year survivorship free of revision was 40% in matched conventional THAs ( P = 0.91) and 100% in matched HAs ( P = 0.19). CONCLUSIONS: DMs showed markedly lower rates of dislocation than conventional THAs, with overall revision rates remaining comparable among different designs. DMs should be considered the option of choice for oncological hip reconstruction if compared with conventional THAs. HAs are a feasible alternative when encountering femoral disease involvement only. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Superior outcomes of total hip arthroplasty without prior lumbar arthrodesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: The number of patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) surgery after previous lumbar arthrodesis (LA) is rising. Literature suggests that LA may significantly impact pelvic biomechanics and potentially compromise the success of prosthetic hip replacement. This study aims to evaluate complication rates, dislocation rates, and revision rates in patients with prior LA undergoing THA surgery compared to those undergoing THA surgery without prior LA. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A PICOS template was developed to ensure a structured approach. The search for relevant studies was performed across five databases, including Pubmed, Scopus, Embase, Medline, and Cochrane. The selected articles were evaluated based on the Levels of Evidence (LoE) criteria. The Coleman Methodology Score (mCMS) was employed to analyze the retrospective studies. This systematic review and meta-analysis were registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). For the outcomes that allowed for a meta-analysis performed using R software, a p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The final analysis included seventeen studies comprising a total of 3,139,164 cases of THA. Among these cases, 3,081,137 underwent THA surgery alone, while 58,027 patients underwent THA with a previous LA. The study investigated various factors, including dislocation rates, revision rates, and complication, as well as the surgical approach and type of implant used, for both the THA-only group and the group of patients who underwent THA with prior LA. The analysis revealed a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) for all variables studied, favoring the group of patients who underwent THA alone without prior LA. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated a statistically significant superiority in all analyzed outcomes for patients who underwent THA-only without prior LA. Specifically, patients with isolated THA implants experienced significantly lower incidences of THA dislocation, wound complications, periprosthetic joint infection, revision, and mechanical complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Periprosthetic fracture following anterior approach or dislocation after posterior approach: which one is the lesser evil?

INTRODUCTION: The most common approaches in total hip arthroplasty (THA) have different complication profiles; anterior-approach (AA-THA) has an increased risk of periprosthetic fractures (PPF); posterior-approach (PA-THA) is associated with higher dislocation risk. However, the relative severity of one versus the other is unknown. This study aims to compare outcome of patients who suffered PPF after AA-THA with those that sustained dislocation after PA-THA. METHODS: This is a retrospective, single-center, multi-surgeon, consecutive case-series of primary THA patients. In a cohort of 9867 patients who underwent THA, 79 fulfilled the approach-specific, post-operative complication criteria, of which 44 were PPF after AA-THA and 35 with dislocation after PA-THA (age 67.9 years (range: 38.0-88.1), 58.2% women). Outcome included complication- and revision- rates, and patient-reported outcomes including Oxford Hip Score (OHS). RESULTS: At 5.8 years follow-up (range: 2.0-18.5), reoperation was more common in the dislocation after PA-THA group (23/35 vs. 20/44; p = 0.072). Change of surgical approach occurred in 15/20 of patients with PPF after AA-THA, but none in those with dislocation after PA-THA. Following re-operation, complication rate was greater in the PPF group (9/20 vs. 4/23; p = 0.049). At latest follow-up, OHS were superior in the PPF after AA-THA group [42.6 (range: 25.0-48.0) vs. 36.6 (range: 21.0-47.0); p = 0.006]. CONCLUSION: Dislocation following PA-THA is more likely to require revision. However, PPF following AA-THA requires more often a different surgical approach and is at higher risk of complications. Despite the increased surgical burden post-operative PROMs are better in the peri-prosthetic fracture group, especially in cases not requiring reoperation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, case-control study.

Prior hip arthroscopy increases the risk of dislocation, reoperation, and revision after hip arthroplasty: An updated meta-analysis and systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The indications for hip arthroscopy have been increasing, as have been the number of patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) after hip arthroscopy. Several matched cohort studies have assessed the impact of prior hip arthroscopy on THA, but conflicting results have been observed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of prior arthroscopy on subsequent THA. METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 checklist. PubMed, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and the Cochrane Library were searched to identify relevant studies. Dichotomous variables were summarized qualitatively as a meta-analysis of pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and continuous variables were summarized as standardized mean differences and 95% CIs. P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. The risk of bias was evaluated for each study, as was publication bias. RESULTS: In patients who underwent hip arthroscopy prior to THA, the ORs for dislocation, reoperation, and revision were 2.02 (P = 0.01), 1.66 (P = 0.01), and 2.15 (P = 0.001), respectively. There were no significant between-group differences in the Harris Hip Score (HHS; P = 0.40), WOMAC (P = 0.069), FJS-12 (P = 0.77), estimated blood loss (P = 0.48), and surgical time (P = 0.16). CONCLUSIONS: Prior hip arthroscopy is a risk for postoperative dislocation, reoperation, or revision after conversion THA. However, prior hip arthroscopy has no effect on patient-reported outcomes, or operative factors such as surgical time and blood loss.